Survey on Sample Sizes of Postgraduate Theses in Agricultural Education and Extension in Universities of Nigeria

Michael Ejime Ikehi, Francis M. Onu, Florence O. Ifeanyieze, Patrick S. Paradang, Mmachukwu G. Nwakpadolu, Lilian U. Ekenta, Clara U. Nwankwo

Abstract


The study focused on the representativeness of the sample sizes generated for populations under study in survey studies in Agricultural Education and Agricultural Extension. The study was carried out in Nigeria. A total of 4561 completed survey theses submitted to the Departments of Agricultural Education and Agricultural Extension in federal universities in Nigeria for the award of various postgraduate degrees between 2008 and 2018 were studied. The objectives of the study were to report the effect of sample size on the confidence level and margin of error of the generated data and to determine the frequently cited formula for generating sample sizes and their implications. The most frequently cited method for generating sample sizes was reported. Findings further revealed the problems associated with using nonstatistical methods to generate sample sizes. The study recommended the use of mathematically proven formula in determining sample sizes in survey studies to generate statistically dependable, reliable and generalizable data.


Keywords


Post graduate thesis; Confidence level; Margin of error; Population; Sampling error, Survey; Nigeria

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, A. (2006). Conducting research in education and the social sciences. Enugu, NG: Tian ventures.

Anaekwe, C. M. (2007). Basic research methods and statistics in education and social sciences. Onitsha, NG: Sofie Publicity and Printry Ltd.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Methods of social research. Boston; Allyn and Bacon Inc

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2009). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Abingdon, Oxon; Routledge.

Creswell, J. (1994). Research design, qualitative and quantitative approach; London; Sage publications

Eboh, C.C. (2009). Social and economic research. Enugu, Nigeria; African Institute of Applied Economics

Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach. London: Sage.

Field Surveys Team. (2014). Calculating the right survey sample size. Retrieved 23rd May, 2016, from http://fluidsurveys.com/university/calculating-right-survey-samplesize/

Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P. & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245. doi:10.1080/08870440903194015

Fugard, A. J. & Potts, H. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1005453.

Guest, G., Bunce, A. & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903

Kothari, C.R. (2004) Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. 2nd Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi

Kume, H. (1991). Statistical methods for quality improvement. Tokyo; 3A Corporation.

Mustafee, S. (2014). Statistical methods for agricultural science. New Delhi; Scientific International PVT Ltd.

Nwana, O. C. (1981). Introductory to educational research. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41, 105–121. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1

Uzoagulu, A. E. (2011). Practical guide to writing research project report in tertiary institutions. Enugu, NG: Cheston Publishers.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26725/JEE.2019.1.31.6200-6208

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.